book
Home    Basics Search Strategies EResources Things to Try Contact
line



Content Evaluation Electronic Clues ... More Information

Related document:
Critical Thinking

Content Evaluation

Introduction

Evaluation of materials should be based on objective criteria and conducted within a particular context. To ask whether a research resource is "good" is to ask a meaningless question -- unless we can determine how "good" is defined. Generally, evaluation of a research source or resource should be based on:

The presence of an item an internet searcher, on a handout, as a footnote in a journal article, or as a link on an institutional site, does not constitute a recommendation nor a guarantee of accuracy and currency of content. Information on the internet, or in journals, is controlled by those who post, or publish, it. It may be wonderful and it may not.

When you evaluate a source or resource, you need to consider its purpose before deciding its worth: is it there to educate, inform, persuade, entertain, advertise or market? Does it have an agenda, either clearly expressed or hidden? Are you looking at a peer-reviewed or scholarly source, or a student paper produced for an undergraduate course? Has the author undertaken to present a balanced paper or has s/he ignored items which did not support her/his theory?

In broad terms, evaluation is determining the value of the information for your purpose. Citation is a necessity when using the information for any research or academic purpose. Generally, citation elements are extracted from evaluation elements. So ... does the material include all needed citation elements (author, title, date, place of publication/publisher)? If it does not, then maybe you should consider the value of what you are reading very carefully.

Logical Fallacies

Evaluating a research resource, electronic or otherwise, is more than simply evaluating the nature and worth of the publication, and the reputation of the publisher and the researcher. At some point, you have to decide whether the data presented were gathered appropriately and whether the conclusions drawn are logical, appropriate and actually a result of the data collected. Even the very best researchers may make mistakes, overlook the obvious, and ignore evidence. The result may be any number of logical fallacies which, in turn, may invalidate both the data and the conclusions.

Top of Page

Electronic Clues and Cues

Gaining Basic Site Insight

If you are doing research, you will be looking for sites that contain information and data. Cute applets, pretty colours, and jokes may be fun, but they may be a waste of time and bandwidth when you are trying to undertake research. The purpose of the site may influence how it is viewed and rated.

The quality and accuracy of the information may be of primary importance to researchers. The determination of these points is largely a matter of experience but there are clues for which researchers can look.

Check the site address. The parts of the URL (domains, country codes, subdomains and standard codes and symbols) tell you something about the originator of the content.

Long-standing (generic) top-level domains are:

.gov
.com
.edu
.org
.net
.mil
.int
government (in the US)
commercial
educational institution (in the US)
organization
network
military (in the US)
international


Other (generic) top-level domains are appearing as well. They include:

.biz
.name
.pro
.museum
.info
.coop
.aero
businessess
individuals
professionals
museums
general information
business cooperatives
aviation industry


Major subdomains help you narrow down the origin of the site. They include:

.cc
.k12
.lib
.mus
.state
.gc
community college
k through 12
library
museum
state government
government of Canada


Country codes may appear, sometimes in conjunction with major domains and subdomains, and sometimes not. If you are doing research that is nationally dependent (for example, law-related) or your linguistics skills are limited, it helps to pay particular attention to the origin of the site you are using. While not every web site registered in a particular country will contain information specific to that country, there may be a greater likelihood that it does. The country codes are listed in ISO 3166, or in Root-Zone Database from IANA. A few examples of country codes are given here:

.ca
.uk / .gb
.fr
.dk
.ru
.jp
.tv
Canada
United Kingdom / Great Britain
France
Denmark
Russian Federation
Japan
Tuvalu


Other standard codes and symbols may also appear, such as:

.ac
.assn
.csd
.co
:80
%20
academic
association
computer science department
commercial
default http port
a space


After you've checked the address, check out the site for:

Running a Web Site

Running a good web site takes an investment of time and money. While time and money do not guarantee quality, the investment made by an organization in its site will give you some indication of the esteem in which the site is held within the organization itself.

Look for statements of responsibility: an author, creator, webmaster, maintainer, with an address and a clickable link to allow comment and questions about the site from users.

Also consider such things as:

Cost/Time Effectiveness

Using a web site requires an investment of time and often, money by the user. That being the case, part of any evaluation should be a consideration of how hard or easy the site is to utilize effectively. Consider such things as:

Top of Page

More Information

General

Arts and Humanities

Legal Information

Medical Information

Science, Engineering, and Technology

Peer Review Process

Top of Page

linebook

This page copyright, created and maintained by Linda Hansen.
Comments and suggestions to: lhansen16@gmail.com
Created: 1997/04/11 Last updated: 2017/10/20
Terms of Copyright
This document: ...basics/eval.htm